Username:  Password:
Forgot your username or password?        
     
Home Product Tour FAQ Links Forum Pricing Contact Us Buy Now         
MySF Forums
Home       Calendar
        


««12

Deferred Income and Asset Revaluations Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 27/02/2009 12:50:26 AM
Regular Member

Regular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 19/10/2011 5:36:57 PM
Posts: 17, Visits: 34
Hello

Has there been any progress on fixing this problem.

My auditor picked up the discrepancy in what is reported in the balance and the correct market value of my financial assets. She will not sign off on my fund's audit until the correct values are shown on the balance sheet. I can correct the error through manual entries prior to running the EOY wizard, but I am not happy about having to do this.

This error was reported over 12 months ago and a fix was promised in the next release. Considering I have paid for MYSF, the annual subscritpion for upgrades and now incurring additional auditor fees due to a programming bug/oversight, "I am not happy Jan".

Regards ... Ron

Post #4198
Posted 1/03/2009 5:05:06 PM


MySF Administrator

MySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF Administrator

Group: Administrators
Last Login: 4/11/2010 3:24:01 PM
Posts: 464, Visits: 633
Hi Ron,

This problem has unfortunately surfaced from time to time under various scenarios. Part of the reason for this is that the software makes adjustments to the incremental changes in value, rather than reversing past increases and recalculating from cost base each time. Any changes in cost base are then factored in separately. Over time this calculation has grown exceedingly complex as we added handling for possible scenarios. This has now been changed and this approach has been dropped.

From the next release of the software the year end will reverse all past postings of increases in market value (and the resultant deferred CGT liability). This will be followed by a posting which will record the total increase in market value from the cost base along with the deferred CGT liability.

We have received advice to say that this is the process that most accountants would use in a 'manual' system, specifically because it ensures that all changes in cost base are correctly reflected in the final calculation.

In the current version of the software an additional manual posting is the only option to change the figures shown, but as stated above this will change with the next update.

We expect to release the next update later this week.

Regards,

MySF
Post #4199
Posted 9/06/2011 11:29:39 PM
Regular Member

Regular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 16/02/2012 7:00:01 PM
Posts: 15, Visits: 72
Can MySF provide an update on when this will be fixed? I've exactly the same problem. My accountant & auditor wants this to be adjusted in the next reporting cycle.

Regards,
Ken
Post #4707
Posted 10/06/2011 12:08:55 AM


MySF Administrator

MySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF AdministratorMySF Administrator

Group: Administrators
Last Login: 16/05/2012 7:43:33 PM
Posts: 213, Visits: 978
Hello,

This is a very old thread and the issue discussed here was fixed as part of the version 7.0.0 software update released on the 12/03/2009. The following post outlines the details of the software update:
www.mysf.com.au/members/Topic4215-28-1.aspx

If you're still having issues with this please forward a copy of your fund file through to info@mysf.com.au with instructions on how we can replicate the problem you're seeing.

Regards,

MySF
Post #4708
Posted 12/06/2011 9:19:16 PM
Regular Member

Regular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular MemberRegular Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 16/02/2012 7:00:01 PM
Posts: 15, Visits: 72
I'm sorry. You are indeed right. It has been corrected. I was confused by the individual asset balance (where the cost base was adjusted), and not picking up the difference (whcih was buried under 'Increase in Market Value for 01X'.

Regards,
Ken
Post #4709
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

««12


All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 6:49pm

Powered by InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2012
Execution: 0.266. 9 queries. Compression Disabled.